Schedule →

Bengals vs Ravens league roundup: Ja'Marr Chase leads comeback in thrilling win

By Pro Football News Network AI-assisted••3 min read
Share:
PFNN NFL Pick’em Against the Spread leaguePick against the spread · Every game, every line · Free to play · Weekly leaderboardTake the spread →

Two AFC North teams met, and the story coming out of Cincinnati is a halftime speech. Ja'Marr Chase delivered it, per ESPN, and the Bengals came back to beat the Ravens. Good theater. The box score says the comeback was built out of something more repeatable than volume.

Joe Burrow went 22-of-30 for 292 yards, four touchdowns, no interceptions, a 143.3 passer rating and a 92.6 QBR. The scoring throws went to four different Bengals: Tee Higgins, Chase, Drew Sample and Mike Gesicki. That's a quarterback working through progressions, not forcing the ball to his star. Chase finished with 5 catches for 62 yards on 7 targets. Productive, not dominant. Whatever he said at halftime, his stat line wasn't the mechanism.

Higgins was. Six catches, 148 yards, 24.7 a grab, a 44-yard long. Baltimore's secondary spent the second half losing him. My read: the speech gets remembered, Higgins' average depth of target gets the win. If you want to know whether this Bengals offense is actually fixed, watch whether Higgins keeps drawing that volume once opponents adjust. The speech is unfalsifiable. The 24.7 is not.

Cincinnati also won the hidden downs. Evan McPherson kicked five extra points and never attempted a field goal, meaning the Bengals finished drives instead of settling. Ryan Rehkow averaged 46.0 yards across four punts, four of them downed inside the 20. Dohnte Meyers handled both return jobs, 106 kickoff return yards on four attempts plus 31 on two punts. Cheap yards in a division game are worth as much as a fiery speech.

Baltimore's side is the more interesting problem. Tyler Huntley threw for 298 yards, and the raw rating says 92.5, which reads like a functional day. The QBR says 27.4. That gap is the whole evaluation: Cincinnati sacked him four times for 22 yards, Demetrius Knight Jr. picked him off and returned it 14, and Boye Mafe got home for 1.5 sacks with Dexter Lawrence II adding a sack and two tackles for loss. Huntley's yardage was manufactured after the down was already broken. I don't buy 298 as evidence of anything except volume.

The Ravens' question is now structural. Huntley took the snaps in this box score, and I don't know from this whether that's a one-week arrangement or the baseline. What I do know is that a 27.4 QBR against a four-man pressure look means Baltimore cannot afford neutral downs. Derrick Henry carried 17 times. That's a commitment, but the offense around him isn't converting it into efficient downs.

Huntley is the one hurt most by this. A 92.5 rating will get quoted at him all week; the QBR and the four sacks are what a coordinator sees on tape. The Bengals' defense, maligned by reputation, just produced four sacks and an interception in a game it trailed.

My verdict, owned: Cincinnati's comeback is real and repeatable because Burrow spread four touchdowns across four targets with zero turnovers, and that travels. Baltimore's is not, because 298 yards on a 27.4 QBR is the shape of a loss that hasn't been logged as one yet. If Huntley's protection improves and the rating gap closes, I'm wrong. Until then, the AFC North's second-best team is the one with the quarterback who threw four scores and no picks, not the one with the speech.

PFNN NFL Pick’em Against the Spread league
NFL Pick’em 2026 - Against the Spread
Straight up is easy. Try it against the spread.
Every game, every line · Free to play · Weekly leaderboard
Take the spread →

Researched and drafted with Pro Football News Network's AI reporting system and reviewed under human editorial oversight.

Share: