Schedule →
PFNN NFL Pick’em leaguePick every game. Free. · Free to play · Climb the leaderboard · Earn bragging rightsPlay for free →

NFL Suspends Line Judge Jeff Seeman for Two Games After Incident Involving Arizona Cardinals' Trey McBride

By Pro Football News Network••3 min read• Arizona Cardinals
Share:
PFNN NFL Pick’em leaguePick every game. Free. · Free to play · Climb the leaderboard · Earn bragging rightsPlay for free →

NFL Suspends Line Judge Jeff Seeman Two Games Over Incident With Trey McBride

The NFL suspended line judge Jeff Seeman for two games after an incident in which he appeared to swear at Cardinals tight end Trey McBride, according to ESPN and ProFootballTalk.

The two games are the story. NFL officials get disciplined rarely, and almost never for what they say to a player during a game. The precedent most people will reach for is Roy Ellison, the umpire suspended one game in 2013 after a player accused him of a derogatory remark. That was one game. Seeman got two, which tells you the league office viewed whatever happened as more than a heat-of-the-moment exchange.

The mechanics matter here. A line judge works the line of scrimmage, the same patch of field where a tight end lines up and where a tight end complains about a hold that wasn't called. McBride was on the field a lot in that game: seven catches on 12 targets for 31 yards, a 4.4-yard average that says he spent the afternoon working underneath rather than downfield. That is a player who was around the line of scrimmage and around the officials all afternoon.

NBC News reported the league was reviewing the official's interaction with the Cardinals player before the suspension landed. Review, then discipline. That's the sequence the NFL follows when it thinks it has something on tape or in an official's account.

What the league has not done is explain what Seeman actually said. "Appeared to swear" is a description of a lip-read, not a finding, and the gap between those two things is where the credibility of the whole process lives. The NFL has spent years fighting the perception that officiating is unaccountable. Handing down a two-game ban without a plain account of the conduct leaves the punishment doing work the explanation should be doing.

My read: two games is the right number, and it should be the floor for any official who verbally goes after a player. Players get fined for language that crosses a line. Officials should not be held to a softer standard just because they wear stripes and carry a whistle. If the NFL Referees Association wants to contest the severity, fine. The league should still publish what it found, because the next time an official and a player square up, the question will be whether this discipline was a standard or a one-off.

Seeman sits two weeks. The bigger question is whether the league ever says out loud what it punished him for.

PFNN NFL Pick’em Against the Spread league
NFL Pick’em 2026 - Against the Spread
Straight up is easy. Try it against the spread.
Every game, every line · Free to play · Weekly leaderboard
Take the spread →

Researched and drafted with Pro Football News Network's AI reporting system and reviewed under human editorial oversight.

Share: